
party’s transition committee.
APC restated its earlier “advice to Metuh to urgently undertake a crash course in how to be an opposition party spokesman so he won’t talk or write himself into avoidable trouble” in the days ahead.
The party admonished the PDP spokesman to always cross-check the information available to him in order to separate rumours from facts.
The party said, ”Metuh decided to put his foot in his mouth when he latched on to the statement made by our Transition Committee chairman, forgetting that in making his statement, the chairman was only acting the statesman that he is by not saying anything that will put the Federal Government in a bad light.
”A discerning party spokesman, rather than a rabble-rousing one, would have understood the elder statesman’s stand for what it is instead of using it as a peg to issue a needless, hollow statement that puts his party and government in a bad light.”
”What happened was that following the request by our Transition Committee to meet with them, they invited us to what was the first formal meeting between both Transition Committees. But the meeting was a mere photo-op, as it yielded nothing concrete as far as the handover notes are concerned.
”In fact, what we met at the so-called meeting was far worse than what we had thought. Whereas, we had hoped to get their handover notes on May 14(the date they had indicated to us informally), they told us point blank that the notes won’t be ready until May 24.
”How do they honestly expect us to peruse thousands of pages of handover notes, ask pertinent questions and seek necessary clarifications within four days?
”Despite this setback, we decided not to put the whole issue in the public domain until a babbling Metuh decided to look for trouble, describing the deliberate stonewalling by the Jonathan administration as cooperation.”